Personally I have a great distaste for
Tintin in general. This is more likely because a.) it is a comic and b.) it was
created largely for a young male target audience. However, I can appreciate the
detail, elements and themes that Herge portrayed within it.
I suppose my first point to be argued is
that while Tintin was originally created for children and published in a
Christian newspaper, it can now be evaluated and assessed as something more in
depth. As a children’s genre, one can evaluate the appeal of Tintin’s
adventures and the character himself.
Tintin is a young boy (envisioned by Herge
to be about 14 years old) whose appeal is largely in the universality of his
character and the plainness of his face allowing for the audience to identify
with him. His characteristics include heroism, loyalty, naivety and acceptance
of everyone – along with a never-ending curiosity and sense of adventure – so
what young boy (or girl) would dislike Tintin? This storyline coupled with
Herge’s artistic ability make for a classic mix which transcends time and era –
as Varnum (2001) points out: ‘Images seem more direct, more attractive, and
more seductive than written texts’, especially where (in general) most young
boys would rather be out seeking adventure than reading. Herge creates the
perfect mix of language, adventure, image and story which portrays a reality to
the reader that may be interpreted or mediated through his/her own experience
of the world (p. x. Varnum, R. 2001).
On the flipside, as interpreted to a more
mature audience, Tintin may be appreciated for his political satire, adult
themes and artistic attention to detail and accuracy which Farr (p. 8. 1991)
states has a ‘rock solid foundation in reality’ because his stories are based
on fact with Herge using is reporting abilities to anticipate world events
making for subjects and adventures that do not date as they are historically
sound.
As mentioned before, Tintin can be
appreciated for Herge’s attention to detail in representation locations and
culture relationships at the time. One also needs to consider Orintalism, propaganda
and racial attitudes of the time but I will discuss this in another post. But
mostly I would like to point out what Barry states – in Varnum’s (2001)
introduction – that it is images, not words, that communicate most deeply’. I
feel this is so because as time goes on, words adapt and meanings change
however a picture is static and cannot change. It reflects the exact attitudes
and intentions from when and where it was created – much like a photograph
(sans photoshop manipulation) does.
To sum up, Tintin is appreciated by
children for its exotic locations, adventure and character, whereas adults will
understand and interpret the politics, adult themes, comments and satires.
No comments:
Post a Comment